|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 25 results for Data Envelopment Analysis
Hoda Moradi, Hamid Babaei Meybodi,
Volume 14, Issue 1 (6-2023)
Abstract
Over the past few decades, there has been a growing need to address the limitations of the Data Envelopment Analysis methodology, particularly the issue of freely selecting weights. As a result, common weight models have emerged and expanded. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of CSW methods, analyzing papers and bibliometric information through a systematic literature review. In this study, a total of 116 articles on CSW published between 1991 and 2022 were carefully selected and reviewed. These contributions were categorized based on specific features related to the computational technique or the main purpose of the procedure. The findings revealed that uncertain models had the highest share among the articles in the field of CSW. Furthermore, the Journal of Expert Systems with Applications emerged as the leading journal in terms of the number of publications on CSW models in DEA. The analysis of the bibliometric information of the articles was carried out using advanced software tools, including R-Studio and VOS Viewer... This review offers valuable insights and discussion, which can guide future research endeavors in this field. By addressing the limitations of DEA and exploring various CSW methods, this study contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding in this area.
Jafar Pourmahmoud,
Volume 14, Issue 1 (6-2023)
Abstract
In cost efficiency models, the capability of producing observed outputs of a target decision making unit (DMU) is evaluated by its minimum cost. Traditional cost efficiency models are considered for situations where data set is known for each DMU, while, some of them are imprecise in practice. Several studies have carried out to evaluate cost efficiency using fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA) methods for dealing with the imprecise data that have drawbacks. The issue of presenting improve strategy is ignored for inefficient units, as well as the applied models are not easily implemented. This paper proposes a new extension to evaluate fuzzy cost efficiency using fuzzy extended multiplication and division operations. This method offers a fully fuzzy model with triangular fuzzy input-output data along with triangular fuzzy input prices. In the proposed extension, a new definition of fuzzy cost efficiency is suggested based on the extended operations. Finally, a numerical example is provided to show the applicability of the proposed models.
Jafar Pourmahmoud, Mahdi Eini, Davood Darvishi Salokolaei, Saeid Mehrabian,
Volume 14, Issue 2 (12-2023)
Abstract
In the evaluation of decision making units with classical models of data envelopment analysis, it is assumed that the factors are deterministic. In some decision-making problems, the amount of inputs or outputs of the units is not exactly known and it is a three-parameter interval in grey form. In this case, it is recommended to choose the factors from their center of gravity. In the classic models of data envelopment analysis, all factors are also considered desirable, but in real problems there are undesirable factors too which cannot be used to evaluate problems with undesirable inputs and undesirable outputs. In this paper, a model is presented for calculating the efficiency of decision making units in the presence of the center of gravity of undesirable three-parameter interval grey undesirable factors based on the combination of strong and weak disposability principles. To this end, the proposed method is discussed with a practical example.
Hoda Moradi, Mehdi Abbaszadeh,
Volume 15, Issue 1 (7-2024)
Abstract
Efficiency plays a pivotal role in impacting costs and optimizing resource utilization for
businesses. This study aims to evaluate the technical and scale efficiency of 15 suppliers within
a production unit over a three-year period (2020-2022) using data envelopment analysis
(DEA). The analysis will involve assessing efficiency under two assumptions - constant returns
to scale and variable returns to scale. Variables were selected based on indicator availability,
representation principles, and expert input, with inputs including investment, nonoperating
expense costs, and operational expenses (comprising raw material costs, wages, and
overheads), while outputs encompass net sales and return on investment. Results from the study
indicated that supplier one, scoring 0.5716 assuming constant returns to scale and 0.6790
under variable returns to scale, emerged as the least efficient supplier. Interestingly, only two
suppliers (8 and 15) demonstrated higher efficiency levels. However, the net technical efficiency
of the supply chain showed an increasing concentration, which indicates the overall reduction
of the gap between suppliers and the improvement of the net technical efficiency in the supply
chain of the production unit. This study provides valuable insights into the differences between
suppliers from a macro perspective and offers guidance for manufacturing units looking to
expand their supply chain.
Javad Gerami,
Volume 15, Issue 2 (12-2024)
Abstract
One of the ways to evaluate the performance of decision-making units (DMUs) such as banks and commercial companies is to use the concepts of economic efficiency in data envelopment analysis (DEA). In the process of evaluating the performance of the DMUs, it is important to apply the superior information of the decision maker (DM). In this paper, we obtain cost and revenue efficiency measurement models to evaluate DMUs based on the DM's opinion. In this regard, we use the method of production trade-offs in DEA. Using the production trade-off method, we apply the importance of inputs and outputs to the efficiency measurement process based on the opinion of the DM. We assumed that the cost (price) of each input (output) is different for different DMUs. We present the efficiency scores and efficient targets corresponding to the DMUs. We present an application of the presented models in the banking sector and present the results of the paper.
|
|
